Viewing Study NCT06864559


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 2:53 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 12:53 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT06864559
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2025-03-07
First Post: 2025-02-22
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparison of Three Types of Sutures in Oral Surgery. Study of Bacterial Colonization, Tissue Reaction and Clinical Characteristics: Randomized Clinical Study
Sponsor: Universidad de Granada
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison of Three Types of Sutures in Oral Surgery. Study of Bacterial Colonization, Tissue Reaction and Clinical Characteristics: Randomized Clinical Study
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2025-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Considering the wide variety of surgical sutures currently marketed in the field of Dentistry, it was decided to conduct a study comparing the microbial adhesion and antibacterial activity of three different types of sutures used in Oral Surgery (Silk, non-absorbable polyamide monofilament and non-absorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene).
Detailed Description: The general or primary objective is:

• To compare 3 non-absorbable suture materials used in oral surgery: silk, polyamide monofilament and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.

The specific or secondary objectives are:

* To evaluate how each type of suture influences wound healing and the patient's postoperative period.
* To study bacterial colonization in each type of suture.
* To determine the tissue reaction and clinical characteristics of each suture.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: