Viewing Study NCT06302218


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 4:58 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 3:58 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT06302218
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2024-03-08
First Post: 2024-03-04
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: ESPB vs iPACK+ACB in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Sponsor: Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. iPACK Block With Adductor Canal Block for Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2024-03
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Effect of iPACK block with Adductor Canal Block and ESPB on pain management, and NLR and PLR following knee arthroplasty
Detailed Description: Knee arthroplasty is one of the most common orthopaedic procedures, especially in elderly patients, due to the deformation of joints. Patients may complain of severe pain due to surgical trauma and prostheses. Regional anaesthesia methods may be performed to reduce the surgery's induced stress response, opioid consumption, and opioid-related side effects.

In recent years, the influence of regional anesthesiology on reducing the inflammatory response after surgical procedures has been emphasised. However, very few studies have evaluated the effect of various methods of anaesthesia on the NLR and PLR.

This is the first study to investigate the effect of regional anaesthesia on the pain managementonse expres and stress respsed by the NLR and PLR in patients undergoing knee replacement surgery.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: