Viewing Study NCT07301918


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 4:55 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 3:55 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT07301918
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2025-12-24
First Post: 2025-11-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander in Mixed Dentition Patients With Posterior Crossbite.
Sponsor: Cairo University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Evaluation of the Effects of the Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander in Mixed Dentition Patients With Posterior Crossbite: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2025-12
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Design: Two-arm parallel randomized clinical trial in mixed dentition (6-12 years).

Arms: (1) 9 mm, 900 g leaf expander; (2) 9 mm Hyrax expander. Follow-up: From appliance insertion → completion of intended expansion → 6-month retention.

Primary outcome: Pain perception during the first 7 days post-insertion (daily patient-reported scale).

Secondary outcomes: Skeletal and dental changes on CBCT.
Detailed Description: Participants receive a banded maxillary expansion appliance cemented to maxillary first permanent molars, assigned to:

Leaf expander arm: Nickel-titanium leaf-spring expander, 9 mm screw, delivering force of \~900 g.

Hyrax expander arm: Conventional tooth-borne jackscrew expander, 9 mm screw. Standard activation: two turns per week.

Retention: Both appliances kept passively in situ for 6 months of retention following achievement of planned expansion.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: