Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 2:52 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 4:21 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03212859
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2021-03-17
First Post:
2017-06-28
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Coach2Move: Sustainable in Daily Practice
Sponsor:
Radboud University Medical Center
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Coach2Move: Sustainable in Daily Practice
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2021-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Implementation of a previously shown (cost-)effective physical therapeutic treatment strategy for community-dwelling older adults.
Detailed Description:
In a previous trial, researchers demonstrated that the Coach2Move approach is superior to regular physiotherapy in terms of increasing physical activity, reducing frailty, improving quality of life and reducing healthcare costs. In short, in less physiotherapeutic sessions, better outcomes were realized.
Despite these promising findings, the research group still has questions regarding the generalisability of these findings. The reservations towards the generalisability of the approach are caused by the following:
1. A modest (n=130), yet somewhat selective study sample was included: nearly half of the eligible individuals declined randomisation and thereby participation. An understanding is needed how this group of eligible non volunteers respond to Coach2Move. Therefore, a study design that avoids randomisation at the patient level will be used.
2. The Coach2Move approach significantly increased the level of moderate physical activity among the treatment group and reduced levels of frailty significantly after 6 months, but the clinical importance of these findings is still unclear. Thus, a replication of the effects in the light of physical functioning is needed in a larger more variable study population and with a longer follow-up.
In addition, the results from the earlier carried out RCT concerning the cost-effectiveness of Coach2Move have to be replicated on a larger scale.
For the reasons mentioned above, it is important to further implement Coach2Move and study its effect, costs, and feasibility in current practice. A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial design is chosen because in the opinion of the researchers, the implementation strategy will do more good than harm (making a parallel design, in which certain practices do not receive the intervention or to withdraw the intervention as would occur in a cross-over design, is unethical) and it furthermore minimizes contamination.
The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of the implementation of a patient and context focused tailored coaching intervention (Coach2Move) in the daily physiotherapy practice for older adults with mobility problems compared to usual physiotherapy. The hypothesis is that Coach2Move leads to better physical outcomes and lower costs than usual care.
Despite these promising findings, the research group still has questions regarding the generalisability of these findings. The reservations towards the generalisability of the approach are caused by the following:
1. A modest (n=130), yet somewhat selective study sample was included: nearly half of the eligible individuals declined randomisation and thereby participation. An understanding is needed how this group of eligible non volunteers respond to Coach2Move. Therefore, a study design that avoids randomisation at the patient level will be used.
2. The Coach2Move approach significantly increased the level of moderate physical activity among the treatment group and reduced levels of frailty significantly after 6 months, but the clinical importance of these findings is still unclear. Thus, a replication of the effects in the light of physical functioning is needed in a larger more variable study population and with a longer follow-up.
In addition, the results from the earlier carried out RCT concerning the cost-effectiveness of Coach2Move have to be replicated on a larger scale.
For the reasons mentioned above, it is important to further implement Coach2Move and study its effect, costs, and feasibility in current practice. A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial design is chosen because in the opinion of the researchers, the implementation strategy will do more good than harm (making a parallel design, in which certain practices do not receive the intervention or to withdraw the intervention as would occur in a cross-over design, is unethical) and it furthermore minimizes contamination.
The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of the implementation of a patient and context focused tailored coaching intervention (Coach2Move) in the daily physiotherapy practice for older adults with mobility problems compared to usual physiotherapy. The hypothesis is that Coach2Move leads to better physical outcomes and lower costs than usual care.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: