Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:51 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:52 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05034718
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-06-13
First Post:
2021-07-29
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Implementation of the Pittsburgh Infant Brain Injury Score
Sponsor:
University of Pittsburgh
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Implementation of the Pittsburgh Infant Brain Injury Score
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
PIBIS
Brief Summary:
This is an implementation study of the Pittsburgh Infant Brain Injury Score (PIBIS) into the UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh emergency department. Children less than 1 year of age presenting to the CHP ED for symptoms which place them at increased risk for AHT as defined in the PIBIS validation study will be potentially eligible.
Detailed Description:
Abusive head trauma is the leading cause of death due to physical abuse. Missing the diagnosis of abusive head trauma (AHT), particularly when it less severe is common and contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. Over the past 10 years, the investigators have derived and subsequently prospectively validated the Pittsburgh Infant Brain Injury Score (PIBIS), a point of care clinical decision rule to help physicians determine when it is appropriate to obtain neuroimaging in infants who present to the ED for evaluation of soft neurologic signs such as vomiting and fussiness. The results of the NIH multi-center prospective validation were published in 2016 in Pediatrics.
The next step in evaluating PIBIS as a clinical prediction rule is to perform an implementation study. Children less than 1 year of age presenting to the CHP ED for symptoms which place them at increased risk for AHT as defined in the PIBIS validation study will be potentially eligible.
Discrete fields in the electronic health record - including patient age, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, temperature and chief complaint - will be used to identify potentially eligible children in a systematic and efficient manner. Children who are potentially eligible based on this initial screen will trigger an alert to the nurse who will then complete a brief powerform to ensure eligibility and assess for inclusion/exclusion criteria. Due to the nature of the research, the investigators will seek a waiver of informed consent as has been done in similar studies at our institution and others. At this point, eligible children will be considered enrolled.
For children enrolled during the intervention period, providers will be presented with a detailed decision support strategy which encourages - but does not require - use of the PIBIS to make clinical decision re: the need for neuroimaging. For children enrolled during the control period, no other clinical decision support will occur. The duration of this evaluation period will be 24 months.
The next step in evaluating PIBIS as a clinical prediction rule is to perform an implementation study. Children less than 1 year of age presenting to the CHP ED for symptoms which place them at increased risk for AHT as defined in the PIBIS validation study will be potentially eligible.
Discrete fields in the electronic health record - including patient age, Emergency Severity Index (ESI), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, temperature and chief complaint - will be used to identify potentially eligible children in a systematic and efficient manner. Children who are potentially eligible based on this initial screen will trigger an alert to the nurse who will then complete a brief powerform to ensure eligibility and assess for inclusion/exclusion criteria. Due to the nature of the research, the investigators will seek a waiver of informed consent as has been done in similar studies at our institution and others. At this point, eligible children will be considered enrolled.
For children enrolled during the intervention period, providers will be presented with a detailed decision support strategy which encourages - but does not require - use of the PIBIS to make clinical decision re: the need for neuroimaging. For children enrolled during the control period, no other clinical decision support will occur. The duration of this evaluation period will be 24 months.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: