Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:45 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:47 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06276218
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-02-23
First Post:
2024-02-18
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Efficacy of Self - Adjustable Clavicular Brace Versus Standard Clavicular Brace for Treatment of Mid Shaft Clavicle Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Study
Sponsor:
Prince of Songkla University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Efficacy of Self - Adjustable Clavicular Brace Versus Standard Clavicular Brace for Treatment of Mid Shaft Clavicle Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Study
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-02
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
A randomized control trial was conducted to compare the outcomes of conservative management for closed midshaft clavicular fractures using self-adjustable clavicular brace and standard clavicular brace.
Detailed Description:
Ten patients aged 18-75 years with midshaft clavicle fractures were enrolled in the study during February 2022 to February 2023. 6 patients were managed with standard clavicular brace and 4 patients with self-adjustable clavicular brace. All patients were scheduled for follow-up appointments at 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Results were assessed based on clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes using the DASH questionnaire, pain, measured by VAS, analgesic usage, displacement, shortening, time to union, and patient satisfaction,
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: