Viewing Study NCT04189718


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 4:43 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 3:44 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT04189718
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2019-12-06
First Post: 2019-12-02
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification Versus Conventional Implant Site
Sponsor: Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Osseodensification Versus Conventional Implant Site Preparation Protocol During Dental Implant Placement. A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2019-12
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The present study is a human, prospective, randomised controlled clinical trial conducted to explore and compare the clinical and radiological outcome of Osseodensification protocol with conventional implant site preparation protocol. The trial is in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) criteria, 2010.
Detailed Description: Twenty two dental implants were placed in twelve healthy individuals satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited for the study. A detailed, thorough medical and dental history was obtained and each patient was subjected to comprehensive clinical and radiological examination. All patients were informed about the nature of the study, the surgical procedure involved, potential benefits and risks associated with the surgical procedure and written informed consent were obtained from all patients.

All the patients received Norris implant. the implant site preparation technique being Osseodensification protocol for the test group and conventional implant site preparation protocol for the control group, eleven in each group. The clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline, immediate post implant placement, six months and twelve months postoperatively.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: