Viewing Study NCT01289418


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 4:32 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 3:34 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT01289418
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2012-08-21
First Post: 2011-02-02
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: Surveillance for Adverse Events Following Pandemic H1N1 Immunization
Sponsor: PHAC/CIHR Influenza Research Network
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Short and Long-Term Electronic Surveillance of a Large Number of Healthcare Workers Following Administration of an Adjuvanted Ph1n1 Vaccine
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2012-08
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Influenza vaccines are continuously modified to adjust to the virus antigenic shifts or drifts, and its safety profile may vary. While generally considered safe, influenza vaccines have been associated in the past with increases in cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (1976) or with oculorespiratory syndrome (2001). The emergence of a novel strain of H1N1 influenza virus (pH1N1) has prompted health departments worldwide to prepare for mass vaccination campaigns with a new H1N1 pandemic vaccine. Following recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO), Canada immunized its population with a dose-sparing adjuvanted vaccine. While the adjuvant developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has been administered to over 39 000 people, only a few hundred will have been vaccinated with the H1N1 formulation in clinical trials before the mass campaign was launched. With this small number, adverse events occurring at a rate \< 1% will not be detected by these clinical trials.

Considering that most cases of pH1N1 to date have been relatively mild, it will be imperative to rapidly detect adverse events serious enough to reconsider the use of the vaccine. Passive surveillance is collecting notifications of adverse events but the sensitivity of this system is not high and its timeliness is not necessarily optimal.

In Canada, healthcare workers (HCW) are among those who were offered the new pandemic vaccine in priority. Because they were offered the vaccine early in the campaign and because they constitute a well-defined group in good general health, this group of people may be well suited for monitoring the safety of the pH1N1 vaccine.

The main objective of this project was to estimate in HCW vaccinated against pH1N1 the frequency of adverse events of sufficient severity to cause work absenteeism or medical consultation.

The active surveillance was done in HCW from 3 sites (Canadian hospitals) participating in the Pandemic Influenza Research Network (PCIRN): (1) Halifax (Nova Scotia), (2) Quebec City (Quebec): 3 hospitals, (3) Toronto
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: