Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:29 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:32 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05450120
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2022-08-08
First Post:
2022-07-05
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Rehabilitation of Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Variants in ICU With Limited Resources
Sponsor:
Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Functional Rehabilitation Protocol in Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Variants in ICUs With Limited Resources: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2022-08
Last Known Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Acute rehabilitation in critically ill patients can improve post-intensive care unit (post-ICU) physical function. Scientific evidence has considered neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as a promising approach for the early rehabilitation of patients during and/or after ICU.
Neuromuscular electrostimulation can be an alternative form of muscle exercise that helps to gain strength in critically ill patients with COVID -19, due to the severe weakness that patients experience due to longer MV, analgesia and NMB duration. Thus, the general objective of evaluating the effects of an early rehabilitation protocol on the strength and functionality of patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 variants and specifically compare the effectiveness of NMES associated with the functional rehabilitation protocol(FR). Also, describe demographics, clinical status, ICU therapies, mortality estimates and Hospital outcomes, of every patients admitted in ICU during the observation periods.
Neuromuscular electrostimulation can be an alternative form of muscle exercise that helps to gain strength in critically ill patients with COVID -19, due to the severe weakness that patients experience due to longer MV, analgesia and NMB duration. Thus, the general objective of evaluating the effects of an early rehabilitation protocol on the strength and functionality of patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 variants and specifically compare the effectiveness of NMES associated with the functional rehabilitation protocol(FR). Also, describe demographics, clinical status, ICU therapies, mortality estimates and Hospital outcomes, of every patients admitted in ICU during the observation periods.
Detailed Description:
Patients in both groups received the functional rehabilitation protocol adapted from the precoce mobilization protocol of Morris et al, 2008. The protocol was defined in 5 stages, with a period between the application of the stages according to the clinical conditions of the patient, in an interval maximum of 24 hours from the beginning of the application of the first stage. The steps included active assisted mobilization exercises, active with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) method diagonals for upper limbs and bridge exercises, bedside sitting, balance reactions, weight bearing, transfer to an armchair, passive and active orthostatism, static gait and ambulation. The experimental group also received a protocol of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), applied bilaterally for 30 minutes, using an electrical stimulator with rectangular pulse waves, symmetrical biphasic, applied to the quadriceps femoris and tibialis anterior muscle at the best motor point, activating fast fibers with a pulse time of less than 300 ms and slow pulses with a pulse time of more than 300 ms, with intensity adjusted to obtain visible muscle contraction and/or according to the patient's tolerance.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: