Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:28 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:31 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03288220
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-10-24
First Post:
2017-09-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Influence of Brain Oscillation-Dependent TMS on Motor Function
Sponsor:
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Influence of Brain Oscillation-Dependent TMS on Motor Function
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-10-21
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Background:
When people have a stroke, they often have difficulty moving their arms and hands. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can improve how well people with and without stroke can move their arms and hands. But the effects of TMS are minor, and it doesn t work for everyone. Researchers want to study how to time brain stimulation so that the effects are more consistent.
Objective:
To understand how the brain responds to transcranial magnetic stimulation so that treatments for people with stroke can be improved.
Eligibility:
Adults ages 18 and older who had a stroke at least 6 months ago
Healthy volunteers ages 50 and older
Design:
Participants will have up to 5 visits.
At visit 1, participants will be screened with medical history and physical exam. Participants with stroke will also have TMS and surface electromyography (sEMG).
For TMS, a brief electrical current will pass through a wire coil on the scalp. Participants may hear a click and feel a pull. Muscles may twitch. Participants may be asked to do simple movements during TMS.
For sEMG, small electrodes will be attached to the skin and muscle activity will be recorded.
At visit 2, participants will have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). They will lie on a table that slides into a metal cylinder in a strong magnetic field. They will get earplugs for the loud noise.
At visit 3, participants will have TMS, sEMG, and electroencephalography (EEG). For EEG, small electrodes on the scalp will record brainwaves. Participants will sit still, watch a movie, or do TMS.
Participants may be asked to have 2 extra visits to redo procedures.
When people have a stroke, they often have difficulty moving their arms and hands. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can improve how well people with and without stroke can move their arms and hands. But the effects of TMS are minor, and it doesn t work for everyone. Researchers want to study how to time brain stimulation so that the effects are more consistent.
Objective:
To understand how the brain responds to transcranial magnetic stimulation so that treatments for people with stroke can be improved.
Eligibility:
Adults ages 18 and older who had a stroke at least 6 months ago
Healthy volunteers ages 50 and older
Design:
Participants will have up to 5 visits.
At visit 1, participants will be screened with medical history and physical exam. Participants with stroke will also have TMS and surface electromyography (sEMG).
For TMS, a brief electrical current will pass through a wire coil on the scalp. Participants may hear a click and feel a pull. Muscles may twitch. Participants may be asked to do simple movements during TMS.
For sEMG, small electrodes will be attached to the skin and muscle activity will be recorded.
At visit 2, participants will have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). They will lie on a table that slides into a metal cylinder in a strong magnetic field. They will get earplugs for the loud noise.
At visit 3, participants will have TMS, sEMG, and electroencephalography (EEG). For EEG, small electrodes on the scalp will record brainwaves. Participants will sit still, watch a movie, or do TMS.
Participants may be asked to have 2 extra visits to redo procedures.
Detailed Description:
Study Description:
We will study if corticospinal excitability, intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation vary across different sensorimotor alpha and beta electroencephalography (EEG) waveform oscillation phases in healthy adults and chronic stroke patients. In young healthy adults, sensorimotor cortical neuronal spiking is highest at sensorimotor alpha oscillation troughs and lowest at sensorimotor alpha oscillation peaks. Short interval cortical inhibition (SICI) is unaffected by alpha phase, consistent with alpha phase representing a form of transient, pulsed excitation, unaffected by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibition. In contrast to sensorimotor alpha, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes are not maximal at the trough phase of the sensorimotor beta rhythm.
Objectives:
TMS is a potential adjunct therapy for post-stroke neurorehabilitation. So far, it has been customarily applied uncoupled from brain oscillatory activity, resulting in variability in the biological response to each stimulus, small effect sizes and significant inter-individual variability. Alpha band oscillatory activity is linked to cortical excitation and inhibition, motor function and cognitive processing. It is possible that TMS effects could be more consistent when applied to specific phases or phase angles of ongoing brain oscillatory activity. For example, corticospinal excitability (as measured with TMS) in healthy humans varies depending on the sensorimotor alpha and beta oscillatory phase during which TMS is delivered. There is no information available on intracortical facilitation and inhibition as a function of beta phase angle in healthy humans. In Experiments 1 and 3 we have been assessing alpha phase-dependent corticospinal excitability measures. In Experiment 2, we will assess beta and secondarily alpha phase-dependent intracortical inhibitory and facilitatory circuits in young and older adults.
Endpoints:
For experiments 1 and 3, the primary outcome measure is corticospinal excitability. For Experiment 2, the primary outcome is SICI. Exploratory outcome measures may include MEP amplitude variability, SICI, short intracortical facilitation (SICF) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) and TMS-induced oscillations.
We will study if corticospinal excitability, intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation vary across different sensorimotor alpha and beta electroencephalography (EEG) waveform oscillation phases in healthy adults and chronic stroke patients. In young healthy adults, sensorimotor cortical neuronal spiking is highest at sensorimotor alpha oscillation troughs and lowest at sensorimotor alpha oscillation peaks. Short interval cortical inhibition (SICI) is unaffected by alpha phase, consistent with alpha phase representing a form of transient, pulsed excitation, unaffected by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibition. In contrast to sensorimotor alpha, motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes are not maximal at the trough phase of the sensorimotor beta rhythm.
Objectives:
TMS is a potential adjunct therapy for post-stroke neurorehabilitation. So far, it has been customarily applied uncoupled from brain oscillatory activity, resulting in variability in the biological response to each stimulus, small effect sizes and significant inter-individual variability. Alpha band oscillatory activity is linked to cortical excitation and inhibition, motor function and cognitive processing. It is possible that TMS effects could be more consistent when applied to specific phases or phase angles of ongoing brain oscillatory activity. For example, corticospinal excitability (as measured with TMS) in healthy humans varies depending on the sensorimotor alpha and beta oscillatory phase during which TMS is delivered. There is no information available on intracortical facilitation and inhibition as a function of beta phase angle in healthy humans. In Experiments 1 and 3 we have been assessing alpha phase-dependent corticospinal excitability measures. In Experiment 2, we will assess beta and secondarily alpha phase-dependent intracortical inhibitory and facilitatory circuits in young and older adults.
Endpoints:
For experiments 1 and 3, the primary outcome measure is corticospinal excitability. For Experiment 2, the primary outcome is SICI. Exploratory outcome measures may include MEP amplitude variability, SICI, short intracortical facilitation (SICF) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) and TMS-induced oscillations.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17-N-0168 | None | None | View |