Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:25 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:28 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01252420
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2010-12-06
First Post:
2010-07-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Two Weeks of Low Molecular Weight Heparin for Distal Vein Thrombosis
Sponsor:
Monash Medical Centre
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Two Weeks of Low Molecular Weight Heparin for Distal Vein Thrombosis (TWISTER)
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2010-07
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
TWISTER
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a limited duration of treatment (two weeks of low molecular weight treatment) is a safe and effective treatment for distal deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb.
Detailed Description:
Approximately 50% of symptomatic episodes of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) will be confined to the calf veins (distal DVT). The proportion of distal DVT that propagate to the proximal veins, increasing the risk of pulmonary embolism, is not known. The best treatment of isolated distal DVT is therefore controversial and options include no treatment, follow-up scanning and treatment of only those patients with thrombus propagating to proximal veins, and full anticoagulation for periods ranging from 2 weeks to 3 months.
There is good evidence that the 3-month thromboembolic risk in patients with a negative CUS that is limited to the proximal veins is low, in the order of 1%. Previous studies have demonstrated that patients treated with a short period of anticoagulation (4-6 weeks) have a low risk of developing recurrent DVT or PE. In addition, the specificity of CUS for distal DVT is lower than that for proximal DVT, increasing the proportion of false positive findings, making it likely that a proportion of patients diagnosed with distal DVT are treated unnecessarily, with the attendant risks of major and fatal haemorrhage.
The need for anticoagulation of patients with distal DVT to prevent recurrent DVT is therefore uncertain, however a survey of current practice suggested that most patients with this condition currently receive antithrombotic therapy. The impact of anticoagulation on initial patient symptoms, and the subsequent risk of the post-thrombotic syndrome are also unclear, and may be a possible alternative justification for antithrombotic therapy.
In this proposed multicentre, prospective, cohort study, we plan to determine if a shorter duration of anticoagulation (minimum 2 weeks) is a safe and effective treatment for isolated distal vein thrombosis.
There is good evidence that the 3-month thromboembolic risk in patients with a negative CUS that is limited to the proximal veins is low, in the order of 1%. Previous studies have demonstrated that patients treated with a short period of anticoagulation (4-6 weeks) have a low risk of developing recurrent DVT or PE. In addition, the specificity of CUS for distal DVT is lower than that for proximal DVT, increasing the proportion of false positive findings, making it likely that a proportion of patients diagnosed with distal DVT are treated unnecessarily, with the attendant risks of major and fatal haemorrhage.
The need for anticoagulation of patients with distal DVT to prevent recurrent DVT is therefore uncertain, however a survey of current practice suggested that most patients with this condition currently receive antithrombotic therapy. The impact of anticoagulation on initial patient symptoms, and the subsequent risk of the post-thrombotic syndrome are also unclear, and may be a possible alternative justification for antithrombotic therapy.
In this proposed multicentre, prospective, cohort study, we plan to determine if a shorter duration of anticoagulation (minimum 2 weeks) is a safe and effective treatment for isolated distal vein thrombosis.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: