Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:19 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:20 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00915720
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2011-07-20
First Post:
2009-06-04
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Implanted Loop Recorder Post Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
Sponsor:
Thoracic & Cardiovascular Healthcare Foundation
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Implanted Loop Recorder Surveillance of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2010-07
Last Known Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This is a pilot study to determine if implanted loop recorders can more effectively monitor atrial fibrillation recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation.
Detailed Description:
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)is the most common arrhythmia and causes significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment for AF consists of medical therapy and ablation therapy. Medical therapies can help approximately 50% of patients, the rest must resort to ablation procedures.
Ablation procedures aim to isolate the pulmonary vein from the atrial tissue electrically and can be performed either endocardially through catheters inserted through the femoral veins or epicardially through a minimal lateral thoracotomy. Both procedures are accepted as standard of care.
Recurrent AF after ablation therapy can be common and occurs in 50% of patients and could be in a form of short periods of AF or persistent AF with less or minimal symptoms. This is of significant clinical relevance as most of these AF episodes are not recognized and can lead to thromboembolic events such as stroke. However, techniques of surveillance of AF post ablation have been suboptimal. Physicians could use holter monitoring but this is limited to a short period of 24 - 48 hours. Event recorders which are external can be used but patients need to experience symptoms associated with the AF episodes in order to record the episodes.
Better AF monitoring techniques especially after AF ablation are necessary so that recognition of AF recurrence in these patient could be possible and timely anticoagulation therapy initiated may prevent strokes.
This pilot study involves implanting a loop recorder just under the skin to record cardiac rhythms 24 hours per day without any interaction by the patient. These devices are currently approved by the FDA for monitoring of syncope and will be implanted during the patients AF ablation surgery.
Ablation procedures aim to isolate the pulmonary vein from the atrial tissue electrically and can be performed either endocardially through catheters inserted through the femoral veins or epicardially through a minimal lateral thoracotomy. Both procedures are accepted as standard of care.
Recurrent AF after ablation therapy can be common and occurs in 50% of patients and could be in a form of short periods of AF or persistent AF with less or minimal symptoms. This is of significant clinical relevance as most of these AF episodes are not recognized and can lead to thromboembolic events such as stroke. However, techniques of surveillance of AF post ablation have been suboptimal. Physicians could use holter monitoring but this is limited to a short period of 24 - 48 hours. Event recorders which are external can be used but patients need to experience symptoms associated with the AF episodes in order to record the episodes.
Better AF monitoring techniques especially after AF ablation are necessary so that recognition of AF recurrence in these patient could be possible and timely anticoagulation therapy initiated may prevent strokes.
This pilot study involves implanting a loop recorder just under the skin to record cardiac rhythms 24 hours per day without any interaction by the patient. These devices are currently approved by the FDA for monitoring of syncope and will be implanted during the patients AF ablation surgery.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: