Viewing Study NCT01216020


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 4:18 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-01-29 @ 2:55 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT01216020
Status: TERMINATED
Last Update Posted: 2018-01-17
First Post: 2010-10-06
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Cetuximab Plus Radiotherapy Versus Cisplatin Plus Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
Sponsor: Azienda USL 4 Prato
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Multiinstitutional Open Label Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Cetuximab and Radiotherapy Versus Cisplatin and Radiotherapy as Firstline Treatment for Patients With Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (LA-NHSCC)
Status: TERMINATED
Status Verified Date: 2018-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: insufficient recruitment
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: CTXMAB+RT
Brief Summary: BACKGROUND:

Concomitant radiotherapy and cisplatin (CDDP) based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for LA-NHSCC. This combined modality treatment is linked with considerable acute local and systemic toxicity.EGFR is overexpressed in 90-100% of the HNSCC cases and is considered an unfavourable prognostic marker. EGFR costitutive activation is linked with HNSCC pathogenesis.

Cetuximab is a monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody blocking the activation of the receptor and signal transduction. Cetuximab combined with radiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy only in the treatment of LA-HNSCC and is characterized by an acceptable toxicity profile.

RATIONALE:

A direct comparison between concomitant chemoradiotherapy with Cisplatin and the concomitant treatment with radiotherapy associated to cetuximab does not exist.

STUDY DESIGN:

Arm A: Radical radiotherapy (doses and volumes) concomitant with chemotherapy with Cisplatin (40 mg/mq/week) Arm B: Radical radiotherapy (doses and volumes) concomitant with therapy with the monoclonal antibody Cetuximab (400 mg/m2 \["loading dose"\] and subsequently 250 mg /m2/week)
Detailed Description: PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

Evaluation and comparison of the compliance of the two treatments;

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

Evaluation and comparison of the grade and incidence of acute toxicity; Evaluation and comparison of local control; Evaluation and comparison of event free survival (both local control and distant metastases); Evaluation and comparison of cause specific and overall survival.

INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA

* Histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (biopsy obtained from the tumor and/or from its lymphnodal metastases) originating from oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharinx, supraglottic larynx;
* Locally advanced disease, defined by one of the following criteria: every T, N+, M0 ( T1, N1 cases excluded); T3-4, N0, M0;
* Not a nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands tumor;
* General conditions and concomitant diseases not considered a contraindication for chemotherapy or curative radiotherapy;
* No other surgical, chemotherapeutic or radiotherapic treatments for ENT region tumors or for tumors of other anatomical sites (with the exception of non-melanoma cutaneous tumors and of the carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix and of other solid tumors whose primary treatment has been completed more than 3 years before the accrual in this study and never relapsed since primary treatment (the patient having been since then continuously disease- free);
* Availability for follow-up;
* Signed informed consent;
* An interval of maximum 3 weeks between staging procedures for local disease and randomization
* An interval of maximum 2 weeks between randomization and the onset of the treatment

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: