Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 2:48 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 12:53 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06191159
Status:
RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2024-12-16
First Post:
2023-12-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Cosmetic Outcome of Electrocautery, Scalpel and PEAK PlasmaBlade for Surgical Breast Incisions
Sponsor:
University of British Columbia
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Cosmetic Outcome of Electrocautery, Scalpel and PEAK PlasmaBlade for Surgical Breast Incisions
Status:
RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2024-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
SCPPB
Brief Summary:
This study will compare the cosmetic scar result from the use of scalpel, electrocautery, and pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) PlasmaBlade (PPB) for the initial skin incision for total mastectomy procedures without immediate breast reconstruction.
It is hypothesized that there will be no significant difference in mastectomy scar cosmesis.
The purpose and objectives of this study are:
1. To evaluate and compare the cosmetic scar result from the use of scalpel, standard electrocautery, or PEAK PlasmaBlade for initial incision for total mastectomy procedures without immediate breast reconstruction.
2. To inform future equipment choices for breast surgery including potential elimination of scalpels and their attendant risks.
It is hypothesized that there will be no significant difference in mastectomy scar cosmesis.
The purpose and objectives of this study are:
1. To evaluate and compare the cosmetic scar result from the use of scalpel, standard electrocautery, or PEAK PlasmaBlade for initial incision for total mastectomy procedures without immediate breast reconstruction.
2. To inform future equipment choices for breast surgery including potential elimination of scalpels and their attendant risks.
Detailed Description:
Scalpel, electrocautery, and PEAK PlasmaBlade (PPB) have all been shown to be safe techniques for surgical incision, but no study has proven the superiority for cosmesis for PPB incision when compared to conventional electrocautery or scalpel.
The investigators propose a double blind prospective randomized controlled study of consecutive patients scheduled for total mastectomy +/- axilla staging without immediate breast reconstruction to evaluate the cosmetic scar result from the use of scalpel, standard electrocautery or PEAK PlasmaBlade.
Scar cosmesis will be evaluated postoperatively at two-to-four weeks, six months, and twelve months by two independent observers blinded to the equipment used, and patient reported outcomes will be reported using the validated SCAR-Q questionnaire.
The investigators propose a double blind prospective randomized controlled study of consecutive patients scheduled for total mastectomy +/- axilla staging without immediate breast reconstruction to evaluate the cosmetic scar result from the use of scalpel, standard electrocautery or PEAK PlasmaBlade.
Scar cosmesis will be evaluated postoperatively at two-to-four weeks, six months, and twelve months by two independent observers blinded to the equipment used, and patient reported outcomes will be reported using the validated SCAR-Q questionnaire.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
True
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: