Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:16 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:15 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05233020
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2022-02-10
First Post:
2022-01-05
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Robotic Versus Hybrid Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair
Sponsor:
Kuopio University Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Robotic Assisted vs. Laparoscopic Hybrid IPOM Ventral Hernia Repair: a Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Postoperative Outcomes
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2022-01
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
ROHYB
Brief Summary:
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) may be associated with chronic pain, seroma formation, bulging and failure to restore abdominal wall function. These outcomes are risk factors for hernia recurrence and poor quality of life (QoL). Our study evaluates whether robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) diminish these complications compared to LVHR with primary closure of the defect (hybrid).
Detailed Description:
Thirty patients undergoing incisional ventral hernia operation with fascial defect size from 3 to 6 cm will be recruited. Fifteen patients undergo rVHR and fifteen undergo hybrid operation.The main outcome measure is postoperative pain, evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS: 0-10) preoperatively, at 1-week, at 1-month and at 1-year. Hernia recurrence will be evaluated with ultrasound examination at 1-year and QoL using the generic SF-36 short form questionnaire preoperatively, at 1-month and at 1-year.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: