Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:15 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 3:15 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00312520
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2018-04-19
First Post:
2006-04-06
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Pulse Steroids Versus Oral Steroids in Problematic Hemangiomas of Infancy
Sponsor:
The Hospital for Sick Children
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Pulse Steroids Compared to Standard Oral Steroids in the Treatment of Problematic Hemangiomas in Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2018-04
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of the study is to determine if pulse steroids are more efficacious and safer than the standard treatment with oral corticosteroids.
Detailed Description:
Currently there is no prospective study in hemangioma patients answering critical questions such as: which type of steroid should be used,how much should we use and for how long. This study is an investigator blinded study with two arms:one arm is receiving standard treatment with daily oral corticosteroids and the other is receiving intravenous pulse corticosteroids daily for 3 days, monthly for 3 months. The main outcome of the study is assess the efficacy of each treament modality as the percentage improvement in the hemangioma's appearance. The secondary outcomes are the safety profiles of the two drugs and the changes in the angiogenesis markers as a result of treatment intervention.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
Is an Unapproved Device?:
Is a PPSD?:
Is a US Export?:
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: