Viewing Study NCT07253220


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 4:13 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 3:12 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT07253220
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted: 2025-11-28
First Post: 2025-11-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: TAF Monotherapy Versus ETV Combined With TAF on the Efficacy and Prognosis of Immunotherapy for Hepatitis B-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Sponsor: Sun Yat-sen University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study Comparing TAF Monotherapy Versus ETV Combined With TAF on the Efficacy and Prognosis of Immunotherapy for Hepatitis B-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date: 2025-11
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Study Objective: To compare the efficacy and prognosis of systemic cancer therapy between TAF monotherapy and ETV plus TAF combination therapy in patients with unresectable, advanced hepatitis-B-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HBV-HCC).

Study Design: Prospective, interventional cohort study. Participants: Patients with histologically or radiologically confirmed unresectable, advanced HBV-HCC who are scheduled to receive immune-based systemic therapy at The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria are provided below.

Intervention: Enrolled participants will be assigned to receive either TAF monotherapy or ETV combined with TAF for HBV suppression.

Primary Outcome: Overall survival (OS) at 24 months after initiation of systemic therapy, compared between the two HBV-treatment strategies.

Secondary Outcomes: Decline in HBV DNA and HBsAg levels at 1, 3, 12 and 24 months.

Sample Size: 120 HCC patients (60 per arm). Statistical Analysis: All analyses will be performed with SPSS. Continuous variables will be tested for normality (Shapiro-Wilk). Normally distributed data are presented as mean ± SD; non-normally distributed data as median (IQR). Twenty-four-month OS will be estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with a Cox proportional-hazards model adjusted for age, BCLC stage, AFP level, and ICI regimen. PFS will be compared using the log-rank test; ORR and HBV DNA undetectable rate will be compared with χ² tests. Inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) will address selection bias, and multiple imputation will handle missing data.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: