Viewing Study NCT00970320


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 4:13 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 3:11 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT00970320
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2016-10-18
First Post: 2009-09-01
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: Prevalence and Treatment of Anal Incontinence (AI) in Primiparous Women
Sponsor: Ostfold Hospital Trust
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Prevalence and Treatment of Anal Incontinence in Primiparous Women
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2016-08
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Traumatic tears of the sphincter ani muscles after delivery may result in symptomatic urinary and anal incontinence, particularly in primiparas.

The efficacy of pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) in treating urinary incontinence (UI)is well documented, however, to date there is little evidence to support the efficacy of PFME in treating symptomatic anal incontinence.

This project consists of three separate studies. The prevalence survey/ study (1), investigates the prevalence of symptomatic anal incontinence among primiparas at Ostfold Hospital Trust Fredrikstad, Norway and St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway, and the results in this study will form the basis of the two identical randomized controlled trials (RCT) investigating the treatment efficacy of PFME two groups of postpartum women. Women reporting symptomatic anal incontinence at six months postpartum (2) and women who have sustained a traumatic 3rd or 4th degree tear of the sphincter ani muscles during delivery (3), respectively, are randomized to an intervention group receiving PFME treatment for six months, or a control group. All RCT participants will undergo examination of PFM strength and activity, as well as anal ultrasound prior to randomization and after the intervention period.
Detailed Description: The recruitment in RCT ( 2) has been lower than expected (49/72). Due to financial reasons and problems with logistics and preparations for the main hospital (Ostfold Hospital Trust) moving into a new hospital, we were unable to extend the recruitment period in study 1. In RCT (3) AI was not an inclusion criterion. However, as both RCTs had the same outcome measure; anal incontinence, and a joint randomization process, stratified on hospital site and whether the participants had sustained an obsteric anal sphincter injury at delivery or not, the results from these studies will be reported together.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: