Viewing Study NCT04046120


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 4:12 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 3:11 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT04046120
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2022-07-14
First Post: 2019-08-02
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Medical Compression Bandage Application Techniques by Measuring Interface Pressures Depending on Whether or Not the Heel is Included in Patients With Open Venous Ulcers
Sponsor: Nantes University Hospital
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Medical Compression Bandage Application Techniques by Measuring Interface Pressures Depending on Whether or Not the Heel is Included in Patients With Open Venous Ulcers: Non-inferiority, Controlled, Randomized Trial
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2022-07
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: COMPARACHILLE
Brief Summary: The importance of wearing medical compression to heal the venous ulcer has already been shown. However, no studies have been carried out on variations in medical compression tape and their impact on interface pressures which explains the lack of consensus on how to lay, including or not to include the heel. Studies on adherence to patients with medical compression have been carried out showing that one of the determining factors is comfort. The investigators therefore wish to conduct a randomized open prospective quantitative study comparing these two modes: including or not the heel .
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: