Viewing Study NCT03212820


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 4:12 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 3:10 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT03212820
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2017-07-11
First Post: 2017-07-06
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla.(Group B ) A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Sponsor: Cairo University
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2017-07
Last Known Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: 20 patients were selected requiring implant placement and divided randomly into two groups (10 in each group)

* for the study group, starter drill is used to locate the point of insertion as planned then pilot drill is also used to the full desired working length after that all other sequential drills are used at a low speed (50-70 rpm) without irrigation .
* In the study group: implant will be inserted in the low speed osteotomy site.
* In the control group: implants will be inserted in the conventional prepared osteotomy site.
* For both groups there is no surgical guide used.
* The flap will then be copiously irrigated with saline in preparation for closure.
* The flap will then be closed using interrupted 4/0 resorbable sutures.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: