Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 11:45 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:12 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00120445
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2012-03-09
First Post:
2005-07-11
Brief Title:
Comparison of Air and Expansile Gas in Pneumatic Retinopexy
Sponsor:
Khon Kaen University
Organization:
Khon Kaen University
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Air and Expansile Gas in Pneumatic Retinopexy
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2012-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The objective of the study is to evaluate the results of using air versus expansile gas perfluoropropane in the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment by pneumatic retinopexy comparing the retinal reattachment rate and post-operative visual recovery
Detailed Description:
To the best of the investigators knowledge there have been no clinical trials to compare air and expansile gas in pneumatic retinopexy The investigators hypothesize that both air and expansile gas have the same properties of gas and remain in the eye for 5-6 days which is long enough to have moderate chorioretinal adhesion to seal the retinal break If the investigators can prove that air is equivalent to expansile gas in this procedure it can save a lot of money for the country Therefore the investigators are conducting a randomised controlled double-blind study to compare the results of using air and perfluoropropane in pneumatic retinopexy for treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None
Secondary IDs
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRF470116 | OTHER_GRANT | Thailand Research Fund | None |