Viewing Study NCT02747420


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 4:08 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-02-24 @ 6:56 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT02747420
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2021-01-26
First Post: 2016-04-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: PTNS Versus Sham Efficacy in Treatment of BPS
Sponsor: NYU Langone Health
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Randomized Controlled Trial of PTNS Versus Sham Efficacy in Treatment of Bladder Pain Syndrome
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2021-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This is a prospective, single center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation to sham in the treatment of Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis (BPS/IC) through 12 weeks of therapy.
Detailed Description: This is a pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of the systematic effects of posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) treatment compared to an inactive sham intervention in female subjects with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) in an intent-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome measure will be the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) a single item questionnaire assessing overall impression of improvement over time at the initial 12 weeks endpoint.

It is hypothesized that subjects randomized to the PTNS arm will demonstrate a greater improvement in both pain and quality of life scores, when compared with subjects who are randomized to the sham arm.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: True
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: