Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 2:46 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 6:58 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06861959
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-03-10
First Post:
2025-02-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparison Volume-controlled Ventilation, Pressure-controlled Volume-guaranteed Ventilation, and Pressure-controlled Ventilation During Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery in the Steep Trendelenburg Position
Sponsor:
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison Volume-controlled Ventilation, Pressure-controlled Volume-guaranteed Ventilation, and Pressure-controlled Ventilation During Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery in the Steep Trendelenburg Position: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Objective:
This study aimed to compare the effects of three different mechanical ventilation modes-Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV), Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV), and Pressure-Controlled Volume-Guaranteed Ventilation (PCV-VG)-on pulmonary and hemodynamic variables during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position. The hypothesis was that PCV and PCV-VG would be superior to VCV in optimizing respiratory mechanics and improving oxygenation, particularly by reducing peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak).
Methods:
Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Sixty ASA I-III patients aged 20-65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position were included (20 patients per ventilation group).
Patients were randomized into VCV, PCV, and PCV-VG groups. Intraoperative ventilation was performed with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg, PEEP of 5 cmH2O, and intra-abdominal pressure maintained at 12-14 mmHg.
Data were collected at four time points: T1 (after induction, supine), T2 (30 min after CO2 insufflation, Trendelenburg), T3 (60 min after pneumoperitoneum), and T4 (after CO2 deflation, supine).
Primary outcome: Ppeak comparison between groups. Secondary outcomes: Dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn), mean inspiratory pressure (Pmean), gas exchange, and hemodynamic parameters.
This study aimed to compare the effects of three different mechanical ventilation modes-Volume-Controlled Ventilation (VCV), Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV), and Pressure-Controlled Volume-Guaranteed Ventilation (PCV-VG)-on pulmonary and hemodynamic variables during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position. The hypothesis was that PCV and PCV-VG would be superior to VCV in optimizing respiratory mechanics and improving oxygenation, particularly by reducing peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak).
Methods:
Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Sixty ASA I-III patients aged 20-65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position were included (20 patients per ventilation group).
Patients were randomized into VCV, PCV, and PCV-VG groups. Intraoperative ventilation was performed with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg, PEEP of 5 cmH2O, and intra-abdominal pressure maintained at 12-14 mmHg.
Data were collected at four time points: T1 (after induction, supine), T2 (30 min after CO2 insufflation, Trendelenburg), T3 (60 min after pneumoperitoneum), and T4 (after CO2 deflation, supine).
Primary outcome: Ppeak comparison between groups. Secondary outcomes: Dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn), mean inspiratory pressure (Pmean), gas exchange, and hemodynamic parameters.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: