Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-06 @ 1:05 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 10:58 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01724827
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2018-03-13
First Post:
2012-09-10
Brief Title:
Ceramic Versus Composite in the Treatment of Posterior Teeth by Inlays or Onlays
Sponsor:
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Organization:
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Overview
Official Title:
Ceramic Versus Composite in the Treatment by Inlays or Onlays of Posterior Teeth Affected by Tooth Substance Loss a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2018-03
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
CECOIA
Brief Summary:
The main purpose of this trial is to determine which material between ceramic and composite is best to manufacture dental inlays and onlays in the treatment of moderate dental substance losses generally due to dental caries Restorations will be done using direct Computer Assisted Design and Manufacturing CAD-CAM Another aim of this study is to determine which factors influence the success of these restorations
Detailed Description:
WHO estimates dental caries prevalence to be over 90 adults worldwide When tooth substance loss due to the decayed tissue is small a filling is done by the dentist directly When the substance loss is important dentists often treat it with a crown which presents the disadvantage of further mutilating the tooth An intermediate technique consists in manufacturing an inlay or an onlay these restorations become more and more common since they are a minimally invasive solution in such cases Inlays and onlays can be made of metal ceramic or composite Patients tend to refuse metallic restorations so that dentists generally have to choose between composite and ceramic Composite wears whereas ceramics fracture Published in vitro studies provide possible answers to which material is most effective but very few clinical studies have been conducted to confirm them Materials choice for inlay manufacturing is thus more country-based than evidence-based Most french dentists choose composite while US dentists prefer ceramics for example The main objective of this trial is to compare the clinical performance of ceramic and composite inlaysonlays Other objectives include looking for the prognostic factors of these restorations and validating the criteria proposed by the World Dental Federation FDI to evaluate dental restorations
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None