Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:04 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 2:59 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03086902
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2018-06-06
First Post:
2017-03-16
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparision of PVC Ablation Techniques
Sponsor:
Sheba Medical Center
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Cryo Ablation vs. Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Premature Contractions
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2018-06
Last Known Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
PVC
Brief Summary:
Several reports have shown the utility of PVC ablation with cryo catheters. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes and safety of Cryo vs. RF for PVCs.
Detailed Description:
Background: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA) is an effective therapeutic strategy in eliminating refractory idiopathic ventricular outflow tract (OT) ventricular arrhythmias (VA). However, early and late recurrences occur commonly. RFCA has also been reported to be associated with collateral damage and pain. The use of Cryo ablation as a safer alternative energy source been previously described. In several reports Cryo was reported to successfully treat VA originating from the OT in the absence of ablation related pain and collateral damage to adjacent structures such as the coronaries. When comparing outcomes and complications of catheter ablation of VA from the papillary muscles of the left ventricle with either Cryo or RF, Cryo was found to be associated with significantly higher success rates and lower recurrence rates than RFCA.
Aim: To compare the outcomes and safety of Cryo vs. RF for PVCs. Methods: Patients with PVC VA will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to RFCA or Cryo ablation. All procedures will be done using a 3-dimensional mapping system (EnSite™ NavX™ system, St. Jude Medical). Ablation will be performed at sites with earliest activation or at least pacemap exhibiting QRS morphology match of \>11/12. Endpoint of procedure will be elimination and non inducibility of the clinical VA. All patients will undergo continuous monitoring for at least 12 hours post procedure and 12 lead Holter and exercise testing 1 month post procedure. Successful ablation will be defined as absence of clinical VA or \> 50% reduction in arrhythmia burden on Holter in the absence of anti-arrhythmic medications.
Aim: To compare the outcomes and safety of Cryo vs. RF for PVCs. Methods: Patients with PVC VA will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to RFCA or Cryo ablation. All procedures will be done using a 3-dimensional mapping system (EnSite™ NavX™ system, St. Jude Medical). Ablation will be performed at sites with earliest activation or at least pacemap exhibiting QRS morphology match of \>11/12. Endpoint of procedure will be elimination and non inducibility of the clinical VA. All patients will undergo continuous monitoring for at least 12 hours post procedure and 12 lead Holter and exercise testing 1 month post procedure. Successful ablation will be defined as absence of clinical VA or \> 50% reduction in arrhythmia burden on Holter in the absence of anti-arrhythmic medications.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
True
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: