Viewing Study NCT04600102


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 4:03 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 2:58 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT04600102
Status: WITHDRAWN
Last Update Posted: 2022-07-11
First Post: 2020-10-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: SCANLOAD: The Effect of Limb Loading on Lower Limb Geometry
Sponsor: University of Iowa
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: SCANLOAD: The Effect of Limb Loading on Lower Limb Geometry
Status: WITHDRAWN
Status Verified Date: 2022-07
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Study related activities were delayed due to the COVID pandemic and then terminated to focus on higher priority efforts.
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Orthotists currently use a range of weight bearing conditions when casting or scanning a patient's limb during the Ankle foot orthosis (AFO) fitting process. This variability in clinical practice is the result of differing opinions regarding the best method for fitting, and a limited understanding of how weight bearing affects the resulting geometry. Few studies have been performed to determine the effect of weight bearing on resulting geometry, or the consistency of the geometry obtained. In this study we seek to evaluate the effect of foot loading on lower limb geometry and the consistency of measurements using low-cost 3D scanning technology, with implications for fitting AFOs.
Detailed Description: Two groups of subjects will be recruited for this study. The first group (Group 1) will consist of healthy, able-bodied individuals with no history of lower extremity trauma. The second group (Group 2) will consist of individuals with unilateral, below-knee functional deficits that require an AFO for daily activities (e.g. fracture, muscle and/or nerve injury, ankle arthritis, or peripheral neurologic disease).

We will obtain a brief medical history to identify major medical conditions or prior injuries that could influence limb geometry and lead to reliance on an AFO for Group 2 participants.

A 3D representation of each participant's lower limb geometry will be obtained using a Structure Core scanner (Occipital, Inc.), which uses an infrared structured light projector to construct a 3D image of an object. The scanner is connected to an iPad; to operate the scanner, the user rotates the iPad camera around the desired object. In seconds, the entire geometry is digitally reconstructed. Measurements will be evaluated using digital imaging analysis software (Standard Cyborg, Inc.). The different conditions being tested are full weight bearing, partial weight bearing, and non-weight bearing. The effect of limb loading on multiple measures of limb geometry will be evaluated. Limb measurements will include 1) width of the metatarsal heads, 2) width of the calcaneus, 3) foot length, 4) foot height, 5) arch height, 6) medial-lateral width between ankle malleoli, 7) minimum circumference above the ankle malleoli, 8) maximum calf circumference , 9) medial-lateral width of the knee condyles 10) anterior-posterior width at mid patellar tendon, 11) distance from bottom of foot to tibial tubercle.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: True
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: