Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 4:02 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 2:55 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06039202
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2023-09-15
First Post:
2023-09-01
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Phase 2 Study of CA102N Combined With TAS-102 Compared to Bevacizumab Combined With TAS-102 in Subjects With Relapsed and/or Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Sponsor:
Holy Stone Healthcare Co., Ltd
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open Label Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of CA102N Combined With Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Compared to Bevacizumab Combined With TAS-102 in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Who Failed the Standard Treatment
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2023-09
Last Known Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
HS-CA102N-103 is a Phase 2, randomized, open label study to evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of CA102N combined with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) compared to bevacizumab combined with TAS-102 in subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who failed the standard treatment (for eg, cancer that has relapsed after or is refractory to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy).
Detailed Description:
HS-CA102N-103 is a Phase 2, randomized, open label study to evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of CA102N combined with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) compared to bevacizumab combined with TAS-102 in subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who failed the standard treatment (for eg, cancer that has relapsed after or is refractory to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan-based chemotherapy).
In this study, the safety, tolerability, and PFS of CA102N in combination with TAS-102 compared to bevacizumab combined with TAS-102 will be evaluated in up to 100 subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer who have previously received fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) biological therapy, and if RAS wild-type mCRC, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy.
In this study, the safety, tolerability, and PFS of CA102N in combination with TAS-102 compared to bevacizumab combined with TAS-102 will be evaluated in up to 100 subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer who have previously received fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) biological therapy, and if RAS wild-type mCRC, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: