Viewing Study NCT03575702


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 3:56 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 2:47 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT03575702
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2019-05-21
First Post: 2018-06-21
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: True

Brief Title: Efficacy and Safety Evaluating Study to Compare Uritos® (Imidafenacin) and Urotol® (Tolterodine) for Treatment of Overactive Bladder.
Sponsor: R-Pharm
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: International, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Study of Efficiency and Safety of Medicinal Product Uritos® (Imidafenacin, Film-coated Tablets; 0,1 mg, Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Japan) and Urotol® (Tolterodine, Film-coated Tablets 2 mg, Zentiva k.s., Czech Republic) for Treatment of Overactive Bladder
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2019-05
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Objective of this study was confirmation on non-inferiority and validation of similar safety profile of new anti-muscarinic medicinal product Uritos® (Imidafenacin) in comparison with other product from m-cholinergic antagonists group Urotol® (Tolterodine).
Detailed Description: To assess clinical efficiency and safety of Uritos® (Imidafenacin) in comparison to Urotol® (Tolterodine) according to its influence on urination frequency and number of urinary incontinence episodes a total of 327 patients underwent screening and 300 patients were randomized (150 patients in the Uritos® group and 150 patients in the Urotol® group). Screening period was not exceeding 2 weeks (14 days). Therapy was performed during 12 weeks (84 days). Every patient received only one treatment (Uritos® or Urotol®) during the treatment period. Patients were returning to the trial site to assessment visits on Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 with permissible variation ± 3 days. Observation period after the end of treatment - 30 ± 5 days (could be performed through telephone connection without need for physician appointment by patient). Maximum observation period: 136 days.

Efficacy and safety parameters were assessed as per primary and secondary endpoints.

The results of this study could potentially provide new optimum approaches to OAB treatment.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: