Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:54 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 2:44 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04893902
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2021-05-20
First Post:
2021-05-14
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Digital VS. Conventional Ear Impression
Sponsor:
Mohamed Mahmoud Dohiem
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
An Innovative Approach for Auricular Rehabilitation Using Two Types Digital Impression Versus Conventional Techniques:
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2021-05
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
What is known:
Ear impressions are made in conventional manner by impression materials which may affect the accuracy of the obtained data and consume time and effort .
What this study adds:
Predesigned ear markers facilitate ear scanning using an intraoral scanner that decreases the probability of in-accuracies using the conventional manner with less time and effort
Ear impressions are made in conventional manner by impression materials which may affect the accuracy of the obtained data and consume time and effort .
What this study adds:
Predesigned ear markers facilitate ear scanning using an intraoral scanner that decreases the probability of in-accuracies using the conventional manner with less time and effort
Detailed Description:
Prosthodontic maxillofacial rehabilitation of acquired or congenital ear defects is considered a challenging procedure. This clinical trial introduces a novel approach for digital scanning of the unaffected contralateral ear using an intraoral scanner in comparison to the conventional impression techniques. CAD/CAM is a very promising design and fabrication of an auricular prosthesis for patients with unilateral ear defects.
Purpose: This study aims to compare digital impression technique using an intra-oral digital scanner IOSfor the unaffected ear with markers /without markers versus traditional techniques with hydro colloidal impression materials.
Purpose: This study aims to compare digital impression technique using an intra-oral digital scanner IOSfor the unaffected ear with markers /without markers versus traditional techniques with hydro colloidal impression materials.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: