Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:48 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 2:36 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07115602
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-08-11
First Post:
2025-07-16
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Methodology to Transfer High Volumes of Data for Distant Expert Radiographic Evaluation of Pelvic Ring Injuries
Sponsor:
Axel Gamulin
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Retrospective Multi-expert Diagnostic Imaging Evaluation of Pelvic Ring Injuries: Methodology for Transferring Large DICOM Data Volumes to Remote Experts, and Survey Designed to Isolate Information Obtained From Different Imaging Modalities
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-08
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The aim of this retrospective cohort study based on a prospectively filled registry was to determine whether standard anteroposterior pelvic radiographs with and without pelvic binder provide valuable information on pelvic ring injury anatomy and stability when compared to computed tomography images alone. The ultimate goal was to improve the management of these injuries in both emergency and definitive treatment.
Detailed Description:
At the core of the study was a stepwise pelvic imaging evaluation of pelvic ring injury patients by a panel of international pelvic trauma experts. The assessment was conducted in 3 sequential steps:
1. Review of computed tomography images alone.
2. Addition of a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with a pelvic binder.
3. Addition of a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph without a pelvic binder.
At each step, experts independently classified the injury (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthsesfragen / Orthopaedic Trauma Association and Young and Burgess classifications), assessed mechanical stability and recommended definitive treatment.
1. Review of computed tomography images alone.
2. Addition of a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with a pelvic binder.
3. Addition of a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph without a pelvic binder.
At each step, experts independently classified the injury (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthsesfragen / Orthopaedic Trauma Association and Young and Burgess classifications), assessed mechanical stability and recommended definitive treatment.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: