Viewing Study NCT00111345



Ignite Creation Date: 2024-05-05 @ 11:43 AM
Last Modification Date: 2024-10-26 @ 9:12 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT00111345
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2012-05-23
First Post: 2005-05-19

Brief Title: Therapy-Optimization Trial for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemias AML in Children and Adolescents
Sponsor: University Hospital Muenster
Organization: University Hospital Muenster

Study Overview

Official Title: Multicenter Therapy-Optimization Trial AML-BFM 2004 for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemias in Children and Adolescents
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2012-03
Last Known Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Due to progressive therapy intensification in the four consecutive studies AML-BFM 78 83 93 and 98 prognosis for children with acute myeloid leukemia AML has improved steadily In spite of the intensified therapy rates of morbidity and mortality have remained unchanged or have even decreased Against the background that about 40 of the patients still die from immediate causes of an underlying disease relapse or of nonresponse it seems to be justifiable to intensify therapy - especially for high-risk patients - which on its parts will require an optimization of supportive measures As the present risk stratification into standard- SR and high-risk HR patients has proved effective we will pursue the risk-adapted therapy strategy

The aim of the study is to improve prognosis in children with AML by intensification of cytostatic therapy and to evaluate by randomisation the equivalence of a prophylactic central nervous system CNS irradiation with a total dose of 18 Gy versus 12 Gy
Detailed Description: During the last decade prognosis in acute myelogenous leukemia AML in childhood has improved considerably but still 30 of the children experience a relapse of disease and further 10 fail to respond sufficiently to the present therapies A further intensification of therapy might improve the overall survival of these children but possible implicit side effects have to be considered carefully Increase in dose intensification of the proven effective anthracyclines will be limited by the risk of cumulative cardiotoxicity A liposomal formulation of daunorubicin may offer a possibility to increase dosage at least partially without causing cumulative cardiotoxicity Objective one of this randomised study is to ascertain if this dose increase improves therapy response and overall survival at acceptable toxicity The previous experiences with liposomal daunorubicin gathered from the relapse studies AML-BFM Rez 97 and International Therapy Study Relapsed AML 2001012 as well as from the pilot study AML-BFM 2002P have shown that the induction therapy is feasible in clinical centers with experience in AML therapy without leading to a marked increase of toxicity or prolongation of granulocytopenia

First results of study AML-BFM 98 have shown that the patients of the standard risk SR group did not benefit from an additional second induction HAM On this account we did not reintroduce this second induction course in the present study AML-BFM 2004 However SR patients will take part in the randomisation of initial therapy with a general view to achieving higher effectiveness

For patients of the high-risk group the administration of 2-chloro-2-deoxyadenosine 2-CDA will be integrated in the first phase of consolidation to achieve an even higher intensification It could be shown that 2-CDA possesses good antileukemic activity in pediatric and adult AML In a phase-II study it could also be demonstrated that 2-CDA has good effectiveness in combination with cytarabine Results of phase-II studies conducted at St Jude Childrens Hospital Memphis showed that 2-CDA has good effectiveness especially in children with monoblastic leukemias FAB M4M5 Consequently this intensification for high-risk patients who present in more than half of the cases with monoblastic leukemias FAB M45 may allow further improvement of therapy for this cohort The pilot study AML-BFM 2002P confirmed that the study design was practicable without increasing significantly the risk of higher toxicity However median duration of aplasia was significantly prolonged in comparison to that of the AI cytarabine idarubicin-block Objective two of this study is to determine by randomisation if an improvement of efficiency is possible

Study AML-BFM 98 has already focussed on the question of whether or not doses of CNS irradiation of 12 Gy and 18 Gy are equivalent with regard to their capacity of reducing the risk of relapse As the results of study AML-BFM 87 confirmed the necessity of CNS irradiation but did not reveal the necessary minimum dose this randomisation has been implemented in order to prevent as far as possible late sequelae of CNS irradiation by reducing the radiation dose objective three

As the number of patients of study AML-BFM 98 was not sufficient to resolve this question this randomised analysis has been extended for a second period and will therefore be continued in the current study AML-BFM-2004

Besides the intensification of cytostatic therapy study AML-BFM 2004 seeks to optimise the quality of supportive therapy by implementing measures of quality assurance This demands an up-to-date complete documentation of each therapy phase In studies AML-BFM 93 and 98 about 12 of deaths were due to primary complications such as leukostasis syndrome haemorrhage or severe infections 4 infections in aplasia before achieving remission 4 or infections in remission 4 Maybe the lives of even more children will be saved in the future by improved standards for the prevention of primary complications Further the efficacy of chemotherapy could be improved by less delays in therapy which are often due to infections or other complications

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: None
Secondary IDs
Secondary ID Type Domain Link
DKH 50-2728 None None None