Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 2:42 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-27 @ 12:30 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04564859
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-09-25
First Post:
2020-09-13
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
The Efficiency of HHHFNC Between Unheated Oxygen Therapy in Difficult Weaning Patients After Extubation in RCC
Sponsor:
Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
The Efficiency of Heated Humidifier High-Flow Nasal Cannula Between Unheated Oxygen Therapy in Difficult Weaning Patients After Extubation in Respiratory Care Center
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
HHHFNC
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in the prevention of extubation failure in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Detailed Description:
There have been many clinical trials comparing the role of Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula or Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the prevention of extubation failure.
These review all have similar results summarized here:
Compared with Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula provides better patient comfort, fewer oxygen desaturation episodes, lower likelihood of interface displacement, and, lower reintubation rate than Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.
However, most of these clinical trials focused on participants experiencing acute respiratory failure.
Investigators of this study want to find something difference between oh these two groups.
These review all have similar results summarized here:
Compared with Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula provides better patient comfort, fewer oxygen desaturation episodes, lower likelihood of interface displacement, and, lower reintubation rate than Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.
However, most of these clinical trials focused on participants experiencing acute respiratory failure.
Investigators of this study want to find something difference between oh these two groups.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: