Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:44 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 2:29 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06988202
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-11-07
First Post:
2025-05-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparative Effectiveness of Different Techniques for Repeat Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Sponsor:
University of Rochester
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparative Effectiveness of Different Techniques for Repeat Ablation After Failed Initial Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Status:
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
REPEAT-AF
Brief Summary:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of irregular heartbeat doctors see. People with AF sometimes have a procedure called an ablation to help get their heart back into a normal rhythm. However, this treatment doesn't always work. This study is looking at whether adding an extra step to the usual ablation-specifically treating another area of the heart called the left atrial (LA) posterior wall-can help people feel better overall, compared to just repeating the standard pulmonary vein isolation ablation procedure.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: