Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 2:41 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-25 @ 1:12 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04584359
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-10-19
First Post:
2020-08-24
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Effects of Osteopathic Manipulations and Muscle Training on the Myoelectric Activity of the Pelvic Floor
Sponsor:
Giselle Notini Arcanjo
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparasion of the Effects of Osteopathic Manipulations and Muscle Training on the Myoelectric Activity of the Pelvic Floor in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-10
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of four different interventions on pelvic floor muscle electromyographic activity in women with stress urinary incontinece: i) a global osteopathic protocol (myofascial, visceral, and articular techniques), ii) one manipulation technique (high velocity, low amplitude (HVLA)/thrust) of the sacroiliac joint and T10-L2, iii) Pelvic Floor Muscle training, and iv) a control group with no intervention. The hypothesis is that the global osteopathic protocol and HVLA technique can increase pelvic floor muscle electromyographic activity to a level greater than or equal to the standard care established in the literature (pelvic floor muscle training).
Detailed Description:
Participants represented a convenience sample and were recruited from hospitals, urogynecology doctors' clinics, invitations via social networks, gyms, clubs, and sports consultants. Women had to be between 30 and 60 years old and report symptoms of urine loss due to exertion in the last six months.The participants were randomly allocated into four groups (G1 = intervention using an HVLA/thrust technique for the sacroiliac and T10-L2 joints, G2 = global osteopathic protocol, G3 = PFT, and G4 = control) by a blinded researcher with a spreadsheet of random numbers.The primary outcome measure was surface electromyography (EMG) performed at five different times: before the intervention and immediately, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and four weeks after. This evaluation was performed by a physiotherapist with ten years of experience in urogynecology and expertise in PFM electromyographic evaluation who was blinded to the group allocation.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: