Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:37 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 2:21 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01578902
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2020-12-17
First Post:
2011-10-31
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
True
Brief Title:
Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy for Low Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
Sponsor:
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy for Low Risk Localized Prostate Cancer (pHART 3)
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2020-11
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
pHART3
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of a short course of radiotherapy (35 Gy / 5 fractions / 29 days) for the treatment of low-risk prostate cancer.
Detailed Description:
Rationale for Proposed Study With the availability of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) at the Odette Cancer Centre (OCC), there is an opportunity to explore the use of a much more intensive hypofractionation schedule for prostate cancer. Using an alpha/beta ratio of 1.3, a dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions would be equivalent to 88 Gy delivered in 2 Gy fractions. For normal tissues (alpha/beta value of 2), this would be equivalent to 78 Gy in 2 Gy fractions. As such, the linear quadratic equation predicts that 35 Gy in 5 fractions should not result in any increased late toxicity for normal tissues compared to standard dose escalated radiotherapy. However, the biological dose to the prostate cancer would be significantly increased. As a safety precaution for this study proposal, the investigators propose to deliver 35 Gy in 5 fractions over 5 weeks (one radiotherapy fraction of 7 Gy per week) to allow for normal tissue repair.
With IMRT, it is expected that there will be superior conformality of the high dose region around the target volume. As well, the use of daily on-line imaging will allow us to eliminate interfraction prostate motion errors and use tighter planning target volume margins for any residual intrafraction motion. At OCC, such an approach has already been shown to be feasible and is currently employed in the phase 1/2 concomitant boost study for high risk prostate cancer.
If proven to be safe and effective, such a hypofractionated radiotherapy schedule may have significant practical advantages as well. With only 1 fraction of radiotherapy delivered each week (for a total of 5 weeks), there are huge savings in resource utilization and increased convenience for patients.
The investigators propose to start a small phase 1 study to explore the use of this dose fractionation for men with low risk prostate cancer. The primary endpoint for this small pilot study would be acute and late normal tissue toxicities. If proven to be feasible and safe, external peer-reviewed funding will be sought to further explore this novel treatment schedule in a larger phase 2 setting.
With IMRT, it is expected that there will be superior conformality of the high dose region around the target volume. As well, the use of daily on-line imaging will allow us to eliminate interfraction prostate motion errors and use tighter planning target volume margins for any residual intrafraction motion. At OCC, such an approach has already been shown to be feasible and is currently employed in the phase 1/2 concomitant boost study for high risk prostate cancer.
If proven to be safe and effective, such a hypofractionated radiotherapy schedule may have significant practical advantages as well. With only 1 fraction of radiotherapy delivered each week (for a total of 5 weeks), there are huge savings in resource utilization and increased convenience for patients.
The investigators propose to start a small phase 1 study to explore the use of this dose fractionation for men with low risk prostate cancer. The primary endpoint for this small pilot study would be acute and late normal tissue toxicities. If proven to be feasible and safe, external peer-reviewed funding will be sought to further explore this novel treatment schedule in a larger phase 2 setting.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: