Viewing Study NCT06602505


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 3:33 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 2:15 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT06602505
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2024-09-19
First Post: 2024-09-15
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparative Analysis of Incidence of Newly Developed Postoperative Low Back Pain with Field Block Versus Without Field-block Before Spinal Anaesthesia for Patients Undergoing Caesarean Sections
Sponsor: Tata Main Hospital
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Comparative Analysis of Incidence of Newly Developed Postoperative Low Back Pain with Field Block Versus Without Field-block Before Spinal Anaesthesia for Patients Undergoing Caesarean Sections.
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2024-09
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of field block in preventing postoperative low back pain (PDPB) in patients undergoing Cesarean Sections.
Detailed Description: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of field block with lidocaine 2% (5 ml) administered with a 24G hypodermic needle before spinal anesthesia for patients undergoing LSCS, in preventing the development of postoperative low back pain (PDPB). The study aimed to determine if using a field block would decrease the incidence of PDPB compared to patients who received only spinal anesthesia.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: