Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:32 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 2:14 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT03457805
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2021-01-26
First Post:
2018-02-22
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Prostatic Artery Embolization in Advanced Prostate Cancer
Sponsor:
Dominik Abt
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study.
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2021-01
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This is a pilot study assessing efficacy and safety in patients with advanced prostate cancer.
Detailed Description:
PAE has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of prostatic bleeding and lower urinary tract symptoms arising from bladder outlet obstruction.
Advanced (defined as locally advanced, metastatic or both in this study) PCA is frequently associated with both of these conditions. The currently most frequently performed palliative surgical treatment is TURP. Though performed endoscopically, TURP is associated with significant side effects in this setting. PAE has been shown to have a superior side-effect profile in the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction compared to TURP.
In addition, there is growing evidence that patients with advanced PCA might benefit from cytoreductive therapy (e.g. radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy). However, recent methods of cytoreductive treatment of PCA hold the risk of being highly invasive and are associated with severe side effects. PAE might represent a minimally invasive alternative in this setting.
Therefore, efficacy and safety of PAE in patients with advanced prostate cancer is assessed in this pilot-study.
Advanced (defined as locally advanced, metastatic or both in this study) PCA is frequently associated with both of these conditions. The currently most frequently performed palliative surgical treatment is TURP. Though performed endoscopically, TURP is associated with significant side effects in this setting. PAE has been shown to have a superior side-effect profile in the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction compared to TURP.
In addition, there is growing evidence that patients with advanced PCA might benefit from cytoreductive therapy (e.g. radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy). However, recent methods of cytoreductive treatment of PCA hold the risk of being highly invasive and are associated with severe side effects. PAE might represent a minimally invasive alternative in this setting.
Therefore, efficacy and safety of PAE in patients with advanced prostate cancer is assessed in this pilot-study.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: