Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:31 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 2:14 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00735605
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2010-01-13
First Post:
2008-08-14
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Comparative Study Between Surgical and Non Surgical Treatment of Anismus in Patients
Sponsor:
Mansoura University
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparative Study Between Surgical and Non Surgical Treatment of Anismus in Patients With Symptoms of Obstructed Defecation
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2010-01
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Comparative study between surgical and non surgical treatment of anismus in patients with symptoms of obstructed defecation.
Anismus is a significant cause of chronic constipation. This study came to compare the results of BFB training , BTX-A injection and PDPR in the treatment of anismus patients. Patients and methods: Seventy two anismus patients fulfilled Rome II criteria for functional constipation were included in this study. All patients underwent anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, defecography, and electromyography activity of the EAS. All patients had non relaxing puborectalis muscle.. The patients were randomized into three groups. Group I patients received biofeedback therapy, two times per week for about 1 month. Group II patients were injected with BTX- A. Group 111 partial division of puborectalis was done. Follow up was conducted weekly in the first month then monthly for about 1 year.
Anismus is a significant cause of chronic constipation. This study came to compare the results of BFB training , BTX-A injection and PDPR in the treatment of anismus patients. Patients and methods: Seventy two anismus patients fulfilled Rome II criteria for functional constipation were included in this study. All patients underwent anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, defecography, and electromyography activity of the EAS. All patients had non relaxing puborectalis muscle.. The patients were randomized into three groups. Group I patients received biofeedback therapy, two times per week for about 1 month. Group II patients were injected with BTX- A. Group 111 partial division of puborectalis was done. Follow up was conducted weekly in the first month then monthly for about 1 year.
Detailed Description:
Key words:
Obstructed defecation, chronic constipation, puborectalis, pelvic floor
Obstructed defecation, chronic constipation, puborectalis, pelvic floor
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: