Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:30 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 2:12 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT06339905
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2024-05-06
First Post:
2024-03-25
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
The Effects of EndoActivator on Postoperative Pain and Root Canal Treatment Success
Sponsor:
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Evaluation of the Effects of EndoActivator Use on Postoperative Pain and Root Canal Treatment Success
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2024-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
This study evaluates postoperative pain and radiographic healing of asymptomatic posterior teeth with chronic apical periodontitis following root-canal treatment performed using EndoActivator for irrigation activation.
Detailed Description:
Aim: To evaluate postoperative pain and radiographic healing of asymptomatic posterior teeth with chronic apical periodontitis following root-canal treatment performed using EndoActivator for irrigation activation.
Methodology: In this clinical trial, root-canal treatment was performed on 140 posterior teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. After routine canal preparation, patients were assigned to either a control group treated using conventional needle irrigation (CNI) without activation or to sonic irrigation activation with EndoActivator. All treatment was completed in a single visit. Patients provided self-assessments of the severity of postoperative pain at 1, 2,3 and 7 days using a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) and Wong Baker Face Scale. Patients were recalled at 12 months for clinical and radiographic examinations. Periapical healing was evaluated using a periapical index (PAI), with scores of 1 or 2 considered to represent treatment success and scores of 3, 4, or 5 to represent treatment failure. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with differences of P \< 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Methodology: In this clinical trial, root-canal treatment was performed on 140 posterior teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. After routine canal preparation, patients were assigned to either a control group treated using conventional needle irrigation (CNI) without activation or to sonic irrigation activation with EndoActivator. All treatment was completed in a single visit. Patients provided self-assessments of the severity of postoperative pain at 1, 2,3 and 7 days using a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) and Wong Baker Face Scale. Patients were recalled at 12 months for clinical and radiographic examinations. Periapical healing was evaluated using a periapical index (PAI), with scores of 1 or 2 considered to represent treatment success and scores of 3, 4, or 5 to represent treatment failure. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with differences of P \< 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
True
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: