Ignite Creation Date:
2024-05-05 @ 11:42 AM
Last Modification Date:
2024-10-26 @ 9:12 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT00119925
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2008-10-29
First Post:
2005-07-05
Brief Title:
SPRING-Study Subfertility Guidelines Patient Related Implementation in the Netherlands Among Gynaecologists
Sponsor:
Radboud University Medical Center
Organization:
Radboud University Medical Center
Study Overview
Official Title:
Cost Effectiveness of Two Different Strategies to Implement the NVOG Guideline Programme on Subfertility
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2008-10
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to compare two different strategies to implement the existing Guideline programme on Subfertility as issued by the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology NVOG Therefore an innovative patient-directed strategy will be compared to a control strategy and effectiveness costs and feasibility of both strategies will be assessed
Detailed Description:
The Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology NVOG has developed a guideline programme on Subfertility including 9 guidelines concerning diagnosis and treatment of subfertility and a national IVF protocol
However guidelines in general do not implement themselves large gaps consists between best evidence as described in the guidelines and practice resulting in a large variation between professionals
Our study will compare an innovative patient-directed strategy with a minimal intervention control strategy and effectiveness costs and feasibility of both will be assessed We eventually aim at the most cost-effective strategy to implement the existing subfertility guideline programme
Please Note In our protocol we consider only couples undergoing fertility treatment therefore we aim at gathering information from approximately 5200 records of both male and female participants When reporting eventually on their treatment we will consider them only as couples resulting in reported numbers of approximately 2600 participating couples
However guidelines in general do not implement themselves large gaps consists between best evidence as described in the guidelines and practice resulting in a large variation between professionals
Our study will compare an innovative patient-directed strategy with a minimal intervention control strategy and effectiveness costs and feasibility of both will be assessed We eventually aim at the most cost-effective strategy to implement the existing subfertility guideline programme
Please Note In our protocol we consider only couples undergoing fertility treatment therefore we aim at gathering information from approximately 5200 records of both male and female participants When reporting eventually on their treatment we will consider them only as couples resulting in reported numbers of approximately 2600 participating couples
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
None
Secondary IDs
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZonMw grant no 945-14-116 | None | None | None |