Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:30 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 2:11 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT07214805
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-12-11
First Post:
2025-10-06
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Perceptions of and Reactions to Ultra-Processed Menu Label Designs
Sponsor:
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Understanding Perceptions of and Reactions to Ultra-processed Food Label Designs
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-12
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The primary objective of this study is to explore perceptions and understanding of different menu label designs related to ultra-processed foods (UPF). Participants will be randomized to view a fast-food online menu excerpt featuring one of sixteen labeling conditions and then will answer questions about the participant's reactions to and interpretations of the label, perceived label effectiveness, the intention to purchase a menu item with the label, as well as the participant's perceptions of fast-food menu items with and without the label.
Detailed Description:
This survey will explore the perceptions and understanding of different hypothetical UPF menu label designs. The survey research firm CloudResearch will recruit a sample of \~12,400 adults aged 18 years and older who reside in the United States.
This exploratory study will use a factorial experiment to assess different UPF label designs. Participants will be randomized to view a fast-food menu excerpt with one of sixteen labeling schemes, varying by message ("Ultra-Processed" vs. "Contains Food Additives" vs. "Warning: Ultra-Processed" vs. "Warning: UPF"), background and text color (red background with white text vs. yellow background with black text), and type (icon-plus-text vs. text-only). All menus will consist of a selection of food and beverage items, and select items will have the UPF label.
Participants will be shown the menu and the label in isolation and will then be asked about the participant's interpretations of the label, reactions to the label, perceived message effectiveness (PME) of the label, how helpful the participant finds the label to be, and the participant's intention to purchase a menu item with the label. The participants will also be shown two different individual fast-food items with the label to which the participant was randomized in random order and asked about the perceived appeal and healthfulness of the menu items.
The primary outcome will be intention to purchase a hypothetical menu item with the label. Secondary outcomes include label interpretation, perceived label understandability, perceived label believability, perception that the label grabbed attention, perceived message effectiveness (PME) of the label, perceived helpfulness of the label. Other outcomes include perceived level of appeal of menu items, and perceived level of healthfulness of menu items.
This exploratory study will use a factorial experiment to assess different UPF label designs. Participants will be randomized to view a fast-food menu excerpt with one of sixteen labeling schemes, varying by message ("Ultra-Processed" vs. "Contains Food Additives" vs. "Warning: Ultra-Processed" vs. "Warning: UPF"), background and text color (red background with white text vs. yellow background with black text), and type (icon-plus-text vs. text-only). All menus will consist of a selection of food and beverage items, and select items will have the UPF label.
Participants will be shown the menu and the label in isolation and will then be asked about the participant's interpretations of the label, reactions to the label, perceived message effectiveness (PME) of the label, how helpful the participant finds the label to be, and the participant's intention to purchase a menu item with the label. The participants will also be shown two different individual fast-food items with the label to which the participant was randomized in random order and asked about the perceived appeal and healthfulness of the menu items.
The primary outcome will be intention to purchase a hypothetical menu item with the label. Secondary outcomes include label interpretation, perceived label understandability, perceived label believability, perception that the label grabbed attention, perceived message effectiveness (PME) of the label, perceived helpfulness of the label. Other outcomes include perceived level of appeal of menu items, and perceived level of healthfulness of menu items.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?:
Secondary ID Infos
| Secondary ID | Type | Domain | Link | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5R01DK139327-02 | NIH | None | https://reporter.nih.gov/quic… | View |