Viewing Study NCT04716959


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-24 @ 2:39 PM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 9:07 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT04716959
Status: WITHDRAWN
Last Update Posted: 2022-01-03
First Post: 2021-01-19
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Comparing Two Different Surgical Techniques for Breast Reconstruction
Sponsor: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
Status: WITHDRAWN
Status Verified Date: 2021-12
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Study recommended for closure
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to compare two standard techniques for breast reconstruction-the prepectoral technique and the subpectoral technique. Again, the prepectoral technique involves putting a tissue expander on top of the pectoralis muscle, while the subpectoral technique involves putting a tissue expander under the pectoralis muscle.

The standard approach used at MSK is the subpectoral technique. This study will help researchers find out whether the subpectoral approach is better, the same as, or worse than the prepectoral approach. To decide which approach is better, the researchers will look at which technique causes fewer complications after surgery (for example, infection or the need for a second surgery). Researchers are also interested in seeing which approach causes less pain and use of pain medication after surgery.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: