Viewing Study NCT07104305


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 3:29 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 2:11 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT07104305
Status: SUSPENDED
Last Update Posted: 2025-08-05
First Post: 2019-12-23
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Nudging and Relationship Building With Frequent Contact
Sponsor: University of Texas at Austin
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Nudging and Relationship Building With Frequent Contact
Status: SUSPENDED
Status Verified Date: 2025-07
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Deemed not feasible at current time.
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: This study aims to test in what way a care strategy incorporating frequent contact can benefit patients with musculoskeletal condition that necessitates some adaptation and resiliency to symptoms and limitations that are expected to be either long-lasting or permanent.

Patients will be randomized into either group A, where they will receive the standard amount of contact with their clinician, or group B, in which they will have contact with their clinican more frequently.

The communication strategy may utilize text, email, portal, phone, video or other options as agreed on. The frequency will be at least once a week. All patients will complete a set of questionnaires at the end of the visit.
Detailed Description: Irregular and uncomfortable bodily symptoms are common. Most are well adapted in a healthy life. People seek care when a symptom becomes a concern. Even the effort to attend a routine healthy check-up is usually based on not wanting to miss anything, which is accompanied by at least a slight concern that a problem might be found. People that are seeking care are unsettled to some degree.

This unsettled feeling is often rooted in or worsened by unhelpful thoughts (less effective cognitive coping strategies). An example of a less effective cognitive coping strategy is rumination on worst-case thoughts (catastrophic thinking). The unsettled feeling is worse when thoughts are perceived as facts (cognitive fusion). Cognitive fusion is greater when people are under greater stress or distress.

Clinicians can help people feel better and do more by gently correcting these misconceptions. And when correction of misconceptions is to some degree at odds with a person's experience of reality, expert advice may seem impersonal, dismissive, and uncaring.

Adherence to medical expertise is enhanced by a trusting relationship with one's clinicians. There are several methods for nurturing a clinician-patient relationship. One is to make small agreements or compromises such as ordering a test that is not likely to yield useful information, has a small risk of harm, and uses resources and doing so in the context of efforts to move towards more effective cognitive coping strategies and greater self-efficacy. Another is to use educational tools such as decision aids to depersonalize the transfer of expertise. A third approach is use more frequent contact to deepen the relationship.

This study posits that establishing a frequent-contact plan with a patient that might benefit from a healthier inner narrative can improve health using few resources other than clinician time, with a good patient experience compared to the typical single or infrequent in person specialist office visits.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: