Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-24 @ 2:39 PM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-22 @ 6:44 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01988259
Status:
UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted:
2015-05-22
First Post:
2013-11-13
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Head-neck Coordination Analysis After Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Dorsal Cervical Spine
Sponsor:
Schoen Klinik Hamburg Eilbek
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Comparison of Open vs Minimally Invasive Dorsal Approaches for Foraminotomy and Laminoplasty in the Cervical Spine Through Performance of Head-neck-coordination Analysis
Status:
UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date:
2015-05
Last Known Status:
RECRUITING
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
MISDCS
Brief Summary:
To proof patients' benefit of minimally invasive surgery in the dorsal cervical spine an apparatus to examine head-neck-coordination was constructed.
Two different surgical techniques will be compared:
Laminoplasty: open approach vs minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-approach; Foraminotomy: open approach vs MIS-approach. Each patient will be tested before surgery, postoperative as well as 3 and 12 month follow-up.
Hypothesis is that patients after MIS-approaches perform better in their head-neck-coordination as patients with open approaches.
Two different surgical techniques will be compared:
Laminoplasty: open approach vs minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-approach; Foraminotomy: open approach vs MIS-approach. Each patient will be tested before surgery, postoperative as well as 3 and 12 month follow-up.
Hypothesis is that patients after MIS-approaches perform better in their head-neck-coordination as patients with open approaches.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: