Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:28 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-01-01 @ 12:13 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT04293705
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-05-02
First Post:
2020-02-25
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Congenital Disability and Rehabilitation: the TOPS Program
Sponsor:
IRCCS Eugenio Medea
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Congenital Disability and Rehabilitation of Cognitive and Behavioral Difficulties by Using the Teen Online Problem-Solving (TOPS) Program.
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2021-06
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
TOPS
Brief Summary:
The study aims at evaluating the feasibility and the efficacy of the Teen On-line Problem Solving program (TOPS) in improving executive functioning and behavior problems in adolescents aged 11-19 years with congenital disability due to brain malformation/syndrome.
In order to control for placebo effects, participants are randomized into two intervention conditions. Group 1 performs the regular version of the TOPS, while Group 2 performs a modified version containing no activities on executive functions, behavioral strategies and social skills.
In order to control for placebo effects, participants are randomized into two intervention conditions. Group 1 performs the regular version of the TOPS, while Group 2 performs a modified version containing no activities on executive functions, behavioral strategies and social skills.
Detailed Description:
Adolescents with congenital brain malformation/syndrome often present with executive dysfunction and behavioral and social problems. Ad hoc rehabilitation may significantly ameliorate such difficulties. With this aim, the Teen On-line Problem-Solving program (TOPS) could represent a suitable opportunity of intervention, as it aims at helping children to improve executive and behavioral functioning. The program consists of a web-based platform composed of 10 core sessions and eventual supplementary sessions, providing information and activities on executive functioning, behavioral strategies, social skills and injury-related issues and health and wellness. The program is delivered remotely, with patients performing the intervention at home, together with their families. Biweekly Google Meet sessions with a cognitive-behavioral psychotherapist are scheduled along the entire duration of the intervention to monitor the activities related to the program and the real-life problem-solving process that patients are required to perform during the intervention.
Assessment of executive functions and behavioral problems is conducted before and after the training (immediate post training assessment and follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of the training), in order to investigate the presence of significant changes after the intervention. Both questionnaires and performance-based measures are used.
Participants are randomized into two groups: Group 1 performs the regular version of the TOPS, while Group 2 performs a modified version containing no activities on executive functions, behavioral strategies and social skills.
Based on the average effect of TOPS program reported by a meta-analysis available in the literature (Corti et al., 2019; Hedge's g = 0.39) we estimated a small-to-moderate effect size of f =0.2 (f was calculated based on Hedge's g value). Power analysis was conducted by using GPower3 software. Assuming a correlation of 0.50 between repeated measures and setting the alfa level at P \< 0.05, a sample size of 21 subjects per group is required to obtain 80% of power with our 2 groups x 3 time points design.
Assessment of executive functions and behavioral problems is conducted before and after the training (immediate post training assessment and follow-up assessment 6 months after the end of the training), in order to investigate the presence of significant changes after the intervention. Both questionnaires and performance-based measures are used.
Participants are randomized into two groups: Group 1 performs the regular version of the TOPS, while Group 2 performs a modified version containing no activities on executive functions, behavioral strategies and social skills.
Based on the average effect of TOPS program reported by a meta-analysis available in the literature (Corti et al., 2019; Hedge's g = 0.39) we estimated a small-to-moderate effect size of f =0.2 (f was calculated based on Hedge's g value). Power analysis was conducted by using GPower3 software. Assuming a correlation of 0.50 between repeated measures and setting the alfa level at P \< 0.05, a sample size of 21 subjects per group is required to obtain 80% of power with our 2 groups x 3 time points design.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: