Viewing Study NCT04639505


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 3:24 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2025-12-26 @ 2:03 AM
Study NCT ID: NCT04639505
Status: COMPLETED
Last Update Posted: 2022-01-13
First Post: 2020-11-11
Is NOT Gene Therapy: False
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Predictive Value of New AMH Test Method for Ovarian Response
Sponsor: Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Predictive Value of New AMH Test Method for Ovarian Response in Patients With IVF/ICSI
Status: COMPLETED
Status Verified Date: 2022-01
Last Known Status: None
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: In China, the incidence of infertility is about 15%, and patients need to use assisted reproductive technology (ART) to obtain pregnancy. It is particularly important to accurately predict the patient's ovarian response before initiating controlled ovulation hyperstimulation (COH). At present, the commonly used AMH detection method is enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA), and it has obtained the normal reference range for ovarian response. In recent years, with the development of detection technology, chemiluminescence immunoassay(CLIA) detection reagents have been successively used for the detection of AMH. However, there are few studies on the comparison of these two detection methods. The predictive value of the new method on ovarian response was lack. Therefore, by comparing the two methods of ELISA and CLIA detection of AMH levels in this study, the predictive value of poor ovarian response (the number of retrieved oocyte ≤ 3) and high response (the number of retrieved oocyte ≥ 15) in IVF/ICSI stimulation cycle was analyzed. In order to provide more reference basis for individualized COH, the AMH cutoff value of low and high ovarian response by the new method predicts was analyzed. At the same time, the prediction value of the two methods is compared to determine whether the new CLIA is suitable for clinical application.
Detailed Description: None

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: None
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: False
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: