Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:23 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2026-02-28 @ 8:47 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT02272205
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2025-09-05
First Post:
2014-10-20
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Evaluation of Conventional Antibiotic Prophylaxis During a Change of Hip or Knee Infected at a Time
Sponsor:
University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
Evaluation of the Effect of a Conventional Antibiotic Prophylaxis on the Positivity of Intraoperative Bacteriological Samples During a Change of Hip or Knee Infected at a Time
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2025-09
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
Infection is a serious complications after undergoing total hip replacement. It occurs in about 1% of cases. The optimal treatment of these infections is discussed. The team validated by international publications change strategy of the infected prosthesis at a time.
Antibiotic prophylaxis has significantly reduced the infection intraoperative contamination in orthopedic surgery rates. It must be conventionally administered before the surgical incision. In response to infection, it is typically recommended to start this antibiotic after the completion of the deep bacteriological samples, so as not to negate the risk of these samples by the prior administration of antibiotics. This attitude, however, is not formally validated by the scientific literature. In contrast, two recent publications challenge this practice, and suggest the use of a conventional antibiotic prophylaxis even in septic interventions. Our multidisciplinary team opted for a few months for this new strategy. We wish to evaluate the influence of this new approach results in the treatment of infection in total hip or knee.
Antibiotic prophylaxis has significantly reduced the infection intraoperative contamination in orthopedic surgery rates. It must be conventionally administered before the surgical incision. In response to infection, it is typically recommended to start this antibiotic after the completion of the deep bacteriological samples, so as not to negate the risk of these samples by the prior administration of antibiotics. This attitude, however, is not formally validated by the scientific literature. In contrast, two recent publications challenge this practice, and suggest the use of a conventional antibiotic prophylaxis even in septic interventions. Our multidisciplinary team opted for a few months for this new strategy. We wish to evaluate the influence of this new approach results in the treatment of infection in total hip or knee.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: