Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 3:16 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-26 @ 1:55 AM
Study NCT ID:
NCT05942105
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Last Update Posted:
2025-09-02
First Post:
2023-06-27
Is NOT Gene Therapy:
False
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
Different Localization Techniques for Non-palpable Breast Lesions Comparison: a Retrospective and Multicentric Clinical Study
Sponsor:
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Retrospective Multicentric Clinical Study Comparing Different Techniques for Intraoperative Localization of Non-palpable Breast Lesions During Breast Conservative Surgery
Status:
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Status Verified Date:
2025-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
Localization01
Brief Summary:
Breast conservative surgery (BCS) is nowadays the standard of care for patients affected by early breast lesions. Screening programmes led to an increase of non-palpable breast lesion detection rates. These patients are often eligible for BCS and an accurate preoperative localization technique for the detection of the lesion is required to guarantee a safe surgical excision. The primary goal of BCS is to obtain a complete resection of the tumor with disease-free surgical margins. The presence of tumor on surgical margins on postoperative histological examination of the specimen increases the risk of local recurrence and it requires a surgical re-excision. For all these reasons different techniques for localization of non-palpable breast lesions have been developed over time. Since '70s the wire guided localization (WGL) technique has represented the gold standard; however it has several limitations such as wire migration or fracture and patient referred discomfort related to wire placement. Over time, other techniques have been proposed, such as the radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL), radioactive and magnetic seeds, carbon dye and ultrasound-guided preoperative localization.
Currently there are several studies of comparison between the WGL and the more modern techniques. All of these data claim the effectiveness of the new "wire-free" methodics ensuring a safe surgical resection with tumor-free margins and, in some cases, a better aesthetic result.
Studies of comparison between the modern techniques are limited. There is no scientific evidence of the superiority of a technique over the other. A multicentric Italian survey demonstrated that the most used localization techniques nowadays are the WGL, ROLL, the magnetic seed and the carbon dye.
The aim of this retrospective study is to compare these techniques to assess their efficacy in the localization of non-palpable breast lesions.
Currently there are several studies of comparison between the WGL and the more modern techniques. All of these data claim the effectiveness of the new "wire-free" methodics ensuring a safe surgical resection with tumor-free margins and, in some cases, a better aesthetic result.
Studies of comparison between the modern techniques are limited. There is no scientific evidence of the superiority of a technique over the other. A multicentric Italian survey demonstrated that the most used localization techniques nowadays are the WGL, ROLL, the magnetic seed and the carbon dye.
The aim of this retrospective study is to compare these techniques to assess their efficacy in the localization of non-palpable breast lesions.
Detailed Description:
None
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
False
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
False
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: