Viewing Study NCT01847105


Ignite Creation Date: 2025-12-25 @ 3:11 AM
Ignite Modification Date: 2026-02-28 @ 9:10 PM
Study NCT ID: NCT01847105
Status: UNKNOWN
Last Update Posted: 2013-05-29
First Post: 2013-04-24
Is NOT Gene Therapy: True
Has Adverse Events: False

Brief Title: Assessing Patient Comfort With Two Different Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solutions
Sponsor: Hom, Milton M., OD, FAAO
Organization:

Study Overview

Official Title: Assessing Patient Comfort in Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses When Cleaned and Stored in Two Different Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solutions
Status: UNKNOWN
Status Verified Date: 2013-05
Last Known Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Delayed Posting: No
If Stopped, Why?: Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access: False
If Expanded Access, NCT#: N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status: N/A
Acronym: None
Brief Summary: Tolerability is compared between two Multi-purpose disinfecting solutions (MPDS).
Detailed Description: According to recent surveys of contact lens fitters, the most prescribed treatments for contact lens dryness are: more frequent replacement schedule (24%), refit into different material (23%), rewetting drops (21%) and change care system (15%). Changing care systems has been a standard treatment for CL discomfort for many years. In the same survey, 30% of practitioners felt there is absolutely no difference among solutions with respect to reducing dryness and discomfort.

The investigators set out to compare the clinical performance of these two solutions: AMO's RevitaLens and Alcon's Opti-Free PureMoist.

Study Oversight

Has Oversight DMC: False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?: None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?: None
Is an Unapproved Device?: None
Is a PPSD?: None
Is a US Export?: None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: