Ignite Creation Date:
2025-12-25 @ 2:59 AM
Ignite Modification Date:
2025-12-30 @ 12:09 PM
Study NCT ID:
NCT01093833
Status:
COMPLETED
Last Update Posted:
2016-05-06
First Post:
2010-03-25
Is Gene Therapy:
True
Has Adverse Events:
False
Brief Title:
A Comparison Study of Prototype Continuous Glucose Sensors in the Intradermal and Subcutaneous Spaces
Sponsor:
Becton, Dickinson and Company
Organization:
Study Overview
Official Title:
A Comparison Study of Prototype Continuous Glucose Sensors in the Intradermal and Subcutaneous Spaces
Status:
COMPLETED
Status Verified Date:
2016-05
Last Known Status:
None
Delayed Posting:
No
If Stopped, Why?:
Not Stopped
Has Expanded Access:
False
If Expanded Access, NCT#:
N/A
Has Expanded Access, NCT# Status:
N/A
Acronym:
None
Brief Summary:
The purpose of this study is to compare two continuous glucose sensors, one placed subcutaneous (under the skin) and one placed intradermal (in the skin) over 12-14 hours.
Detailed Description:
This was a single site, non-randomized study. The study consisted of a screening visit (Visit 1), during which the subject was consented and the inclusion and exclusion criteria confirmed, an experimental intervention (Visit 2) and a follow-up visit (Visit 3). The experimental intervention was based on an initial glucose clamp involving a basal intravenous (IV) insulin infusion and IV insulin boluses plus IV glucose infusion / IV glucose boluses as required to maintain euglycemic, hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic plateaus respectively in 41 subjects with Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes. At the end of hour five of the study the glucose clamp was discontinued and subjects given a standardized meal to stimulate a hyperglycemic excursion
Each subject participated in one experimental intervention. During the glucose clamp intervention, the subject's blood glucose was continuously monitored either by means of the Biostator or by frequent venous blood glucose measurements based on a standard lab method (YSI STAT2300 analyzer), and measured by means of the BD Technologies test devices, and the Medtronic Guardian CGM. Once the clamp was discontinued the Biostator was discontinued as well. During the unclamped period and meal the subjects BG was monitored via the YSI Glucose Analyzer, the BD CGM sensor and the Medtronic Guardian CGM.
Each subject participated in one experimental intervention. During the glucose clamp intervention, the subject's blood glucose was continuously monitored either by means of the Biostator or by frequent venous blood glucose measurements based on a standard lab method (YSI STAT2300 analyzer), and measured by means of the BD Technologies test devices, and the Medtronic Guardian CGM. Once the clamp was discontinued the Biostator was discontinued as well. During the unclamped period and meal the subjects BG was monitored via the YSI Glucose Analyzer, the BD CGM sensor and the Medtronic Guardian CGM.
Study Oversight
Has Oversight DMC:
False
Is a FDA Regulated Drug?:
None
Is a FDA Regulated Device?:
None
Is an Unapproved Device?:
None
Is a PPSD?:
None
Is a US Export?:
None
Is an FDA AA801 Violation?: